Computex 2025: Gaming Monitors Now Too Fast

Three cutting-edge gaming monitors were unveiled at Computex, each pushing the boundaries of refresh rates. The standout model is the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG, boasting a 1080p resolution with an astonishing 610Hz refresh rate. Meanwhile, both MSI and Acer introduced 1440p monitors with 500Hz refresh rates, a feat that challenges even the capabilities of an RTX 5090 paired with multi-frame generation technology.

Acer's Predator X27U F5 stands out not only for its speed but also for its QD-OLED technology, promising exceptional color accuracy. Initially launching in Europe and China at a starting price of €899, Acer plans to bring it to the US market, though pricing remains undecided due to ongoing negotiations influenced by tariffs. Given the rising costs of tech products in the US, affordability may be a concern.

MSI's 27-inch MPG 271QR X50 also features a QD-OLED panel but introduces an innovative AI feature. As reported by PC Gamer, the monitor includes a sensor that detects when the user moves away, triggering the display to shut off and engage its burn-in protection. This AI-driven approach to preventing OLED burn-in, common in gaming monitors due to static images, is both intriguing and slightly unnerving.

Do Gaming Monitors Need to Be This Fast?

The emergence of these ultra-fast monitors, particularly the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG, raises questions about the necessity of such high refresh rates. At 1080p and 610Hz, this monitor is exceptionally fast, especially in an era where Nvidia's multi-frame generation technology is pushing frame rates to new heights. Achieving such frame rates in demanding games like Marvel Rivals would require an RTX 5090 and multi-frame generation, which can introduce latency—a critical factor in competitive gaming.

Moreover, to fully leverage these high refresh rates, a powerful CPU is essential. The CPU must be capable of feeding the graphics card with data at these super-high frame rates. Technologies like Nvidia Reflex and frame generation can help, but achieving around 600 fps still demands a robust CPU.

The advantage of such high refresh rates lies in the potential for incredibly low render latency, a significant benefit in competitive gaming environments. For instance, competitive players of Counter-Strike 2 often opt for the lowest settings to maximize frame rates and minimize input lag, which can be crucial in high-stakes matches. However, the high cost of these monitors may make them a niche product, leaving many to question whether the performance gains justify the investment.